首页> 外文OA文献 >The Commercialisation of GP Services:A Survey of APMS Contracts and New GP Ownership
【2h】

The Commercialisation of GP Services:A Survey of APMS Contracts and New GP Ownership

机译:Gp服务的商业化:对apms合同和新Gp所有权的调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Alternative provider of medical services (APMS) legislation enables private commercial firms to provide NHS primary care. There is no central monitoring of APMS adoption by primary care trusts (PCTs), the new providers, or market competition. Aim The aims were to: examine APMS contract data on bidders and providers, patient numbers, contract value, duration, and services; present a typology of primary care providers; establish the extent of competition; and identify which commercial providers have entered the English primary care market. Design of study Cross-sectional study. Setting All PCTs in England. Method A survey was carried out in March 2008 gathering information on the number of APMS contracts, their value and duration, patient numbers, the successful tender, and other bidders. Results A total of 141 out of 152 PCTs provided information on 71 APMS contracts that had been awarded and 66 contracts that were out to tender. Of those contracts awarded, 36 went to 14 different commercial companies, 28 to independent GP contractors, seven to social enterprises, and two to a PCT-managed service; one contract is shared by three different provider types. In more than half of the responses information on competition was not disclosed. In a fifth of those contracts awarded to the commercial sector, for which there is information on other bidders, there was no competition. Contracts varied widely, covering from one to several hundred thousand patients, with a value of 6000-12 pound million, and lasting from 1 year to being open-ended. Most contracts offered standard, essential, additional, and enhanced services; only a few were for specialist services. Conclusion The lack of data on cost, patient services, and staff makes it impossible to evaluate value for money or quality, and the absence of competition is a further concern. There needs to be a proper evaluation of the APMS policy from the perspective of value for money and quality of care, as well as patient access and coverage.
机译:背景技术医疗服务(APMS)立法的替代提供者使私营商业公司能够提供NHS初级保健。没有对初级保健信托(PCT),新提供商或市场竞争对APMS采用情况进行集中监控。目的目的是:检查关于投标人和提供者的APMS合同数据,患者人数,合同价值,期限和服务;介绍初级保健提供者的类型;确定竞争程度;并确定哪些商业提供商已进入英国初级保健市场。研究设计横断面研究。在英国设置所有PCT。方法2008年3月进行了一项调查,收集了有关APMS合同数量,其价值和期限,患者人数,中标者以及其他投标人的信息。结果在152个PCT中,共有141个提供了已授予的71个APMS合同和66个正在招标的合同的信息。在这些授予的合同中,有36个给14个不同的商业公司,28个给独立的GP承包商,七个给社会企业,两个给PCT管理的服务;一份合同由三种不同的提供者类型共享。在超过一半的答复中,没有披露有关竞争的信息。在授予商业部门的那些合同中有五分之一,其中有其他竞标者的信息,因此没有竞争。合同的范围很广,涉及从1到数十万名患者,价值6000-12亿英镑,期限从1年到无限制。大多数合同提供标准,必要,附加和增强的服务;只有少数人提供专业服务。结论缺乏有关成本,患者服务和员工的数据,因此无法评估物有所值或质量,而缺乏竞争则是另一个问题。需要从物有所值,医疗质量以及患者就诊和覆盖范围的角度对APMS政策进行适当评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号